Friday, April 27, 2012

Rape my virgin child!


I went there after my high school class, where all the vultures were anxiously waiting for her death. She cried to me for the help but I didn't move an inch. Lost in bewilderment I watched her, being taken away by them into dungeon. I later on found out that she died that night and that beast after beast still eating her dead mass. I was only 16, I justify myself but deep down inside me that guilt is growing. Today at the age of 27, I came to know it is one of the largest fraternities on earth living on the flesh of dead girls. Like zombies, when only bones are left, these women (process takes its time) start serving this brotherhood.

All of us witnessed these horrific scenes but we do not notice them because we are watching this barbarism from childhood just like mass slaughtering of animals during Eid. Wearing the blood, these beautiful roses die every day and people celebrate with passion the success of this racket.

Virginity is important as like any other offering, impure or used article would become a reason of embarrassment for the parents of the sacrificial. Ironically, majority of these children consider it ‘The day’ of their lives. Prepared since birth, extra care is taken of them after the puberty and it is instilled in their minds that this is their sole reason of existence. You call it ‘Marriage’; I call it ‘Rape my virgin child’.

“We have decided you have to marry (get raped all your life by) him!” order the same parents who otherwise are heard saying “you can’t go out with your male friends darling… you are not a child anymore”. I know you would snub this writing as Fanon reveals “sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.” I am sorry for nuisance but my guilt is not letting me stop.

The same brother, who gets angry if someone looks at her sister, happily drops her to a stranger’s room, without her consent. All this time these brothers, fathers and zombies (mothers) protect their child not because they love her, but for the perfect deal. “Meet my son in law… a degree from Harvard… working with Microsoft… from a reputable family… earns a lot…” not once I heard someone asking if she really loves him. Amazing! It is not even a concern for anyone.

She keeps disposing off all the desires, the fantasies accumulating into her mind since puberty, to save her virginity for a stranger about whom she doesn’t even know if would be capable of satisfying her or not. Yes she does have desires, fantasies, feelings etc. after all she is a human being, which we easily forget. My fiancé, from quite liberal background, specifically told me that she is a virgin. Did she need to? Yes, a woman in this part of the world, even if getting married to a progressive person, wants him to know that she is a brand new product. Can you imagine the stress with which these creatures spend their lives?

Now, as you know even the girls enjoying some liberty do not actually enjoy the freedom, we must move toward a problem existing in the liberal world. Even if given the choice, women in our society are raised in a manner that they feel insecure and dependent all their lives. Naturally they choose their partner not on the basis of their feelings but how capable he is in handling/exploiting those insecurities. It is important to understand here that marriage does not stand on love but other factors that are stronger in an exploiting society.

Even in the cases where marriage is an outcome of pure love, we should keep in mind that, birds can’t fly in the cage. How could you bind it into a contract? How could you put chains around it? Love exists till you have freedom, till you have option. The day you will turn it into a compulsion, it would start decaying. It would turn into a relationship of master and slave, or mere relationship of responsibilities, or just another norm of the society.

Don’t worry, we all are part of this brotherhood but that doesn’t justify this barbarism. Having written all of this, I also fight within myself, a product of this society. We know that any given Sunday anything can happen then why do we want to hold the things? Why do we mark them permanent? My fiancé might one day stops loving me then, she goes back to old one or moves on with a new one, does it really matter?

I am part of the fraternity as well. It is not easy to break away from the society, its norms, values and above all the thinking it is instilling in you. Solution lies in the complete demolition of these social structures, this socioeconomic system which is standing on the foundation of exploitation.

Love and Exploitation cannot run parallel!

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Karachi: Shehr e Charagar se Shehr e Khoonchkan (Part1)





Wednesday, January 11, 2012

The Demagogues

"Veni, vidi, vici", are the words used by the Caesar. In Pakistan Mr. Bhutto, in 1969-70, rose as a real contender of this phrase and now Imran Khan is also joining ranks. Famous for hitting stumps and hearts, he is hitting headlines these days. Speculations, analysis, judgments are being passed on the way IK is constructing his political innings. On one hand there is a section comparing him with Che Guevera while on the other hand his critics consider PTI a clean shaved Jamat e Islami. As a student of Politics I consider views of former nothing but a joke while later are also making serious mistake.

Ok then, Imran Khan is? "Imran Khan is for change", can't you hear the middle class youth of Pakistan? Unlike ZAB, IK was not recognized as potential political player at the beginning of his new career, more than decade ago, but ripples he is creating today are making political pundits crazy. All set for his slogan of 'change' but change what? No one really knows but he shouted "Islamic Welfare State" several times, addressing huge crowd in Karachi, reminding "Islamic Socialism" of ZAB of 1970s.

It is better to analyze these slogans instead of reaching any super conclusion regarding success of this new savior of nation. First part of both Inqilabi Naras is same and clearly communicate wishes of both the Mard e Momins – yes, we are ready to work under the ideology set by establishment and ruling elites of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. This part is not for the masses but for the state and state machinery ensuring, though both are for the change, their rhetoric would not change the social system, order or structure.

It is often argued that at least pro left Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) shouldn't have declare Ahmedis infidels but the argument is baseless as PPP have always been center to right. Few months ago I had an interview with Meraj Muhammad Khan and every occasion I touched ZAB I witnessed water in his eyes but even this sincere friendship failed to stop him from speaking the truth. When he was revealing that ZAB supported army during Bangladesh Massacre he told me in low voice, reflecting his emotions, that when he asked "Bhutto Sahib what are you doing? Country would break up!" ZAB got frustrated "Meraj you would never understand politics".

First rule of Parliamentary Politics is to develop good ties with the power circles and ensure state ideology is part of its program. It is the core ruling idea through which society is being controlled. The groups considering IK, Taliban Khan, fails to remember it was in 1973 that first Mujaheddin training Camp was installed on Pakistani soil (Both Hikmatyar and Haqqani took training during ZAB's period). They also forget who played the historic role of developing OIC and those who remember consider it a step forward. This organization provided perfect ideological foundation for the Jihad culture that was detrimental in Afghan war. Though ZAB found himself hanging but simplistic conclusion - he was, in general, against establishment - is quite imprudent.

What about the second part then? When ZAB decided to make a party, socialism was considered voice of the masses all over the world. It was impossible to attract them without this word. Same is the case with IK as on one hand he is making the King makers glad by strengthening state ideology and on the other hand he is using the term of his time. The concept of welfare state was introduced, in 1950s, to save Europe from socialism and now almost all of those are turning back to capitalism. Presenting such a concept at this juncture of time (time of global recession), for a country like Pakistan, only reflects demagogic capabilities of our rulers.

For me, disturbing is not the play being set up by the haves of this country but the deep alienation of have-nots toward politics. Above all it is the corrupt intelligentsia of this region that is frustrating. It is looking very difficult for them to make the masses, esp. youth, realize what is going on right now. Why? Because they do not have the guts to speak complete truth; they have the guts to criticize IK but they refrain from telling the new generation about the demagogy of ZAB. They are not realizing that only those who know about the past can judge today.

Similar was the condition at the times of Bhashani, Wali Khan and Mujeeb when finally Ayub started looking towards Soviet Union, naturally because no other option was left. Departure of Ayub Khan is important because it makes us understand the fashion in which military elite works. Ayub Khan was brought down not by his foes but his political children (ZAB and Yahya Khan). Both of them were closely knit with the Uncle Sam and had deep roots with in Civil Military Bureaucracy. Military was loosing its grip and there was not a single political group with mass support and pro-establishment stance at the same time. The time was up for the Ayub, and Pakistani Establishment was looking desperately for the savior. ZAB emerged as a real candidate to bridge people of Sindh and Punjab with the establishment. He capitalized on the anger against the privileged and ranted the perfect words – Yes, the words of change.

Today, under the similar circumstances, existing political groups are unable to keep the big guns satisfied. IK, for todays Armed Junta, is the ZAB of its time. Question is whether the unarmed Junta would again be deceived by the Ace of spade. Only intellectuals of this country can save this two of clubs (real junta) by letting them know the triumph of truth.